Syntagma Digital
21st-Century Phi
Stage Latest
  • Auto Insurance
  • Nascar Tickets

The Points Chestnut

I see Bernie Ecclestone has dragged the F1 scoring system into the limelight again, saying that there should be a greater points difference between winning and coming second. It’s a hoary old chestnut that has been tinkered with many times in the past and most changes have made things worse, not better.


Keke Rosberg, 1982

For once, however, I agree with Bernie – the gap between first and second is a bit close at the moment. But an increase to three points difference rather than two should be sufficient, otherwise we risk having championships decided by the halfway mark in years when one team is dominant. Interest in the rest of the season would just drain away.

Bernie’s other suggestion, that the championship go to the driver with most wins, would be a bad mistake, in my opinion. This puts far too much emphasis on winning instead of consistency. And 1982, a year in which the champion won only a single race, is the perfect answer to such a system. Although it is known as the year nobody wanted the championship, in fact it was the most closely-fought season ever. Incredibly, eleven drivers won races that year, Prost, Pironi, Watson, Lauda and Arnoux managing two victories each, while Rosberg, Patrese, Piquet, Tambay, de Angelis and Alboreto took one apiece.

In effect, Bernie is saying that Keke Rosberg did not deserve to be champion that year. Nothing could be further from the truth. Under Bernie’s proposal, the champion would have been Didier Pironi, on equal race wins and second places with John Watson but with a third place to swing the balance. One of Pironi’s wins was stolen in controversial circumstances from Gilles Villeneuve and was not exactly the kind of driving that deserves a championship.

Most of the other race winners shot themselves in the foot – Prost by squabbling with Arnoux all season instead of making sure that he beat him fair and square, Piquet by agreeing to take on development of Brabham’s new BMW turbo engine, and Lauda by being unable to overcome his under-rated teammate, John Watson. In contrast, Rosberg defeated whoever Frank put in the second Williams car (Reutemann, Andretti and Derek Daly were tried) and concentrated on always being near the front in a car that was not really competitive. He deserved the championship all right and it would have been an injustice to give it to anyone else.

It is too simplistic to say that race wins are all that matter. Consistency must always be an important part of the equation too, as I have argued before. And the strange thing is that, when we do get a year in which the driver with the most wins doesn’t become champion, it is always an exciting season of cut-and-thrust, nail-biting finishes and a championship decided at the last. Just ask John Surtees about that.

So I suggest you give the winner one more point, Bernie – that’ll fix it.

4 Responses to “The Points Chestnut”

  1. A championship based on wins…. This is a horrible idea. theoretically speaking one driver could have a great first half the year (technical loophole) and wins 5 and drops out of every other race (technical sh*thole) . Now all the other teams have caught up by copying there design, but the next closest driver only has 2 wins. (possible now that Micheal is retired.) In theory, the first place driver could not even show at the last 3 races and easily take home the Championship, only he wouldn’t need to take it home, hes already there :)

    Granted similar seasons have happened with Micheal at the wheel but that was because his pure dominance not his overall wins.

  2. Absolutely, Dan. The points for places system at least gives some recognition to those who are consistently near the front. And, on those rare occasions when the championship is won by someone with fewer race wins than another, there are always good reasons why he came out on top.

  3. Well, here’s a question that is never to be accounted as fair.

    There are always going to be someone, who is at the moment situated in the middlerange of the points, and who wants to get to the top, but have just not won enough races to be able to raise the required points to win the championship.

    But as i see it, the way the points-system ar as fair as possible now. The teams should consider the winterbreak and the preseason testing as the period to build a titlecontender, not the first half of the season. If they are not good enough prepared when the season starts, their drivers and the team will suffer the loss of points. Better luck next season.

  4. Good point, Bj̦rn Рthere is always another season in which to make up for any perceived injustices!

Leave a Reply